CEOs SUCK (YOUR TAXES)!

Steve Jobs, who just stood down as boss of Apple: "Would the next WASP in line who wants to make an obscene amount of money please step forward."

We all know Chief Executive Officers of large corporations make a fortune, right?

Wall Street can crash, the economy can take a header, unemployment lines can stretch around the block and poverty lines can squeeze more and more people under them. But CEOs are still laughing all the way to the Hamptons.

It's pretty sickening on many levels. For example, these jokers constantly talk about profitability and "remaining competitive." This is corporatespeak for maximizing profits by any available measure... other than cutting their own salaries. And the first port of call is generally the rank and file: pay cuts, benefits cuts, layoffs. Anybody but them.

With the recent attempts to gouge workers at Verizon and in the state of Wisconsin and, well, everywhere else; and with real wages for the majority of the workforce stagnating or declining over the past 30 years, it's nauseating that the top layer of business boys is still at the trough.


THE NUMBERS

So how much do these guys (yes, almost exclusively white males) make? You might want to get out the Mylanta before you read this.

According the the AFL-CIO website, in 2010 the average CEO pay at S&P 500 companies was as follows:

Salary: $1,093,989
Bonus: $251,413
Stock Awards: $3,833,052
Option Awards: $2,384,871
Nonequity Incentive Plan Compensation: $2,397,152
Pension and Deferred Compensation Earnings: $1,182,057
All Other Compensation: $215,911
TOTAL: $11,358,445

Quoting from the same site:

According to the Federal Reserve, U.S. corporations held a record $1.93 trillion in cash on their balance sheets in 2010. But they are not investing to expand their companies, grow the real economy or create good middle-class jobs. Corporate CEOs are literally hoarding their company’s cash—except when it comes to their own paychecks.

In 2010, Standard & Poor's 500 Index company CEOs received, on average, $11.4 million in total compensation— a 23 percent increase in one year. Based on 299 companies’ most recent pay data for 2010, their combined total CEO pay of $3.4 billion could support 102,325 median workers’ jobs.

Fortunately, the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act contains new tools to help limit runaway CEO pay. Shareholders now have a “say-on-pay” vote on executive compensation, and companies must disclose the ratio of CEO-to-worker pay at each company.

And on an important side note, let's not forget that corporations are BY FAR the biggest recipients of welfare -- our tax dollars!


CONCLUSION

There's something very wrong here, obviously. Think about how hard you work and how much you make (if you even have a job, of course). Now, if you divide $11, 358,445 by a salary of $40,000, you get a quotient of 283.96. Now, does anybody really work 284 times harder than you? Or is their knowledge or expertise so unique, so irreplaceable, that they are worth 284 times your sweat? And what exactly do they do to make the world a better place?

Times are very tough, brutal, for many many people. And they were tough a long time before the 2008 recession hit for many millions in the U.S. and around the world. But the one constant is that CEOs do very well, living in their own stratosphere of luxury.

But be careful, fellas. The air will get awful thin up there once you piss off enough people. And they ain't gonna throw you an oxygen tank.

Take care,
Adrian

IF YOU FOUND THIS BLOG POST INTERESTING you might also like to take a look at THE REVOLUTION IS KNOCKING -- PT. 1.

THE HYPOCRITES ON THE HILL -- LET THEM KNOW WHAT YOU THINK!

One of the things that disgusts me most is the way our "system" caters to the rich and puts everybody else in the back seat.

Like kids on an insanely long vacation drive, we're told to be quiet and get lost in the movie playing on the little drop-down screen.

So it was with particular disgust that I read a piece on the Huffington Post website about Republicans blocking unemployment extensions just prior to the Congressional holiday break.

You can almost hear them as they get limo'd to the airport: "Happy holidays, strugglers!"

Now, it doesn't take a long post to explain why I, and millions of others, find this reprehensible. That can be summed up by extracting one paragraph from the article -- a quote from Senator Jack Reed (Dem., Rhode Island):

"On the one hand they [the Republicans] want to provide $700 billion in tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans but not pay for them. And on the other hand they're demanding that UI benefits for the middle class be paid for," Reed said. "That's a little like someone on a diet who orders a Diet Coke and a Big Mac simultaneously."

The problem right now is in the Senate, which, ironically, the Democrats still control (but conservative Dems can swing things).

Go here to find your two state senators and email them that this is not acceptable.

Many folks have already made their voice heard:

"On Wednesday the National Employment Law Project delivered a petition with 100,000 signatures to [Senator Robert] Casey's office calling on the Senate to reauthorize the benefits."

Many people are doing all they can to find work in our perforated and extremely unfair economy. The last thing that should happen is to cut their lifeline.

Don't buy into the argument about lazy hordes, sitting on their couches, collecting free money. Sure, these people exist. But they are the tiny minority. And the money they take from our tax pool is like a marble compared to Jupiter when it's compared to the tax breaks the wealthy suck from us. Don't be duped by the propaganda!

And yes: The money that's being adjudicated on is OUR TAXES. People who've worked and lost their jobs should not be asked to finance the rich while losing their unemployment insurance.

MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD!

Onward,
Adrian Zupp

READ THE HUFFINGTON POST ARTICLE HERE

IF YOU FOUND THIS BLOG POST INTERESTING you might like to take a look at THE ART OF COWARDICE.