Does The "Obama Fist Bump Black Press" Have The Integrity And Credibility To Represent The Best Interests Of The Black Community?

The Grio.COM	The Grio.COM
The Grio.COM	The Root.com

HTML Tables

I give credit to the "Obama Fist Bump Black Press" and their associated band of "Black Progressive Blogger Understudies".  They know what the popular demands of their targeted audience.

The unfortunate problem with respect to the interests of our community is that they use intimate knowledge of our people to manipulate us.  The primary vector of this manipulation is their constant efforts to shift the "Black Consciousness" into the "American Political Domain", making the case that our community-level problems will be solved if we sustain and/or increase our mental and emotional fusion in the "Malcolm X Political Football Game".

The best anti-venom to defend against their efforts is "The Knowledge Of Self And Community".  In having a "reference architecture" of how our community should be and the methodology that these ends might reasonably be expected to be obtained - the antics of the "Obama Fist Bump Black Press" can be scrutinized and seen to be greatly askew from the mindset and consciousness that is necessary to ultimately correct the situation that is at hand.

In this inspection it is clear that the primary objective of these embedded confidence men is to play the role of "obfuscators" - diverting attention away from the "Black Racial Services Machine" that presently dominates all of the institutions within Black America and instead continue their daily "chum feeding" in reference to the area where they wish the "Black Consciousness Focus" to "swim toward".


The Grio.com Michelle Bauchmann Has Failed Black America
Does it stand to reason that a brain trust who was heard a few weeks ago openly debating the practicality of "Speaking Truth To Power" now that "The POWER" is one of their own would later be seen taking an indictment of the ABSOLUTE CONDITION of Black America and - instead of DEFENDING this position as acceptable or unacceptable to Black people's interests he instead "Puts His Ideological Enemy On Trial"?

In his article The Grio.com's Michael Arceneaux has the AUDACITY to make reference to the condition of New Orleans and the failings of Bachmann and any other Republicans who "CARE ABOUT BLACK PEOPLE" to "Do Something!!!" in an effort to prove to Black people that they care.


In the most perverted combination of "A Fish Don't Know He Wet" and the lack of "Intellectual Curiosity", Mr Arceneaux can't bring himself to accept that the "Mission Accomplished City" of New Orleans (and so many others) ARE represented by people who ADEQUATELY convinced the population of Black people who invested their "Equal Black Ballots" to the tune of 50%+1 and thus they stand as the community's representatives - despite the charred and smoldering wreckage of "Dreams De-Hijacked".

This pattern of obfuscation is well documented on this blog. In as much as Mr Arceneaux has the goal of protesting his FRIENDS who are in power.......he is forced to indict his ideological enemies for what they have not extended their hands to "Democrats who are Black" as proof that they are not "Racists".

What should we call those forces who have sold the Black Community a bill of goods, taking our "Equal Black Ballots" and fusing the "Black Community Consciousness" into the "Malcolm X Political Football Game"?

The answer will not appear in The Grio-Root.


Is Clarence Thomas Fit For The Supreme Court?
In the days of  Thurgood Marshall those White racists who saw a Black liberal male attempting to ascend to the highest court in the land were called RACISTS when they threw up claims of  competency, qualifications, and  "womanizing".  When Justice Marshall was later found to be collaborating with the FBI to purge communists from the NAACP it was the "credibility" and pride that he had built up with the Black Progressive-Fundamentalists that allowed his image to surmount these damning charges.

With regard to Justice Clarence Thomas - the modern sight of a Black man with POWER - is tempered by the knowledge that he uses this power as a check against "Progressive-Fundamentalism".  

It is within the context of this "sin" that the Black Quasi-Socialist Progressive-Fundmentalist Racism Chasers join with the White Liberal Snarling Fox Bigots to purge the Supreme Court of its one human being in "melanated form".  They believe that the three White liberal associate justices can sufficiently represent the "Black Progressive interests" until the Black President gets around to appointing a Black Progressive replacement to the liking of "People For The American Way".

Their argument is that Justice Clarence Thomas is not qualified to sit on the highest court of the land (after many decades and sufficient Ivy League credentials).  He is an "embarrassment" to the sentiments of Black America.    He triggers no "pride" in the community.  (Like "Obama" did - but they can't cope with the reality of how much that has exactly bought us).

I still am forced to come back to my previous conclusion because I have not found a better substitute:
CLARENCE THOMAS IS SUPERIOR TO

1. The 8 other justices (4 of them dependable liberals)
2. The array of favorable progressive judges that cascade the architecture of the American Legal System
3. The duly elected "favorable":
1. Mayors
2. Police Chiefs
3. District Attorneys 
4. Criminal Defense Attorneys

Though Thomas is ONE MAN - he appears to have the POWER to trigger the hate filled band of progressive fundamentalists to look his way rather than at the failings of  their friends.

In the world of "Michelle Alexander - The American In-Justice System" Clarence Thomas is a part of that conservative cabal that seeks to destroy the Black community by locking up Black men.  She and those who think in kind are unable to make  note of the far, far, far larger block of authorities that have been appointed into power under the signature of the Black voter and yet the OUTCOMES differ any.

Though they seek to oust Justice Clarence Thomas from power due to "corruption" in the receipt of gifts - these very same people proclaimed that the "attacks" on Rep Charles Rangel, Rep William Jefferson and so many other were RACIALLY MOTIVATED by RACISTS.  With Thomas - they stand on the side of these forces that seek to oust a Black man from power - claiming no RACIST motivation.  They know the "People For The American Way" from hours of scheming together in air conditioned conference rooms.  If there was any hint of racism in their agenda - the NAACP and others would have recognized it beforehand.  :-/

Unlike them I seek to UPHOLD rules across the board.  IF Justice Clarence Thomas  has been proven to act with blatant disregard to the laws that he is bound to - he should set aside.   I just ask that those who bring this documentation to the table do so for all who have similar power and not just those who wield their power in an ideological manner that is counter to their desires.

Philadelphia's Stop And Frisk Policy

I won't be talking about the "Stop and Frisk" policy that various "Mission Accomplished Cities" in the northeast have adopted to slow the scourge of hand guns and drugs in the hands of young people.   If you want to understand this policy - there is an abundance of sources.

Instead I want to focus on The Grio's coverage of this problem.   If you read the article you will see a narrow analysis of the policy and its impact upon young Black males.  In as much as The Grio has a need to protect the "father's" of this policy from their documented complicity in the "Dropout To Jail" sliding scope - they are not going to mention that:

1. Mayor Nutter (D)  assembled the "Police Command Staff" which implemented and enforced this "Stop And Frisk Policy" in the context of the crack down against gun violence that was taking the lives of so many Black males.
2. Police Chief Ramsey - implemented "Stop And Frisk" in Washington DC and then brought this same policy to Philadelphia
3. Other Mission Accomplished Cities such as Washington DC, Baltimore, Atlanta and New York have adopted similar "aggressive policing" policies 

The problem with The Grio's coverage on this matter which one would say is an important component which fills up the"Prison Pipeline" is that while they are more than willing to "spill ink" in the indictment of their ideological and racial enemies - a reader seeking to find a similar point of indictment with their friends - must KNOW THEIR PATTERN OF BEHAVIOR - and understand that in their omission of this direct indictment - IS THEIR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT.    They just have stronger loyalties to their ideology and party which prevents them from filling in the blanks for the reader.

The Root.com Chastises Obama On Libya
 Please read the article above.

Its construction shows that David Swedlick is a one time student and current associate professor at the "Jack White School Of Journalism".

With the subject being:

• Justification for the NATO bombing of Libya  
• The attacks by the American Imperialist and 3 African Colonists On A Sovereign African Nation
•  The High Probability That A "War Is Not The Answer" bumper sticker will also have an "Obama 2008" sticker right beside it

David Swedlick, showing supreme knowledge of his consumers was compelled to open his article on the HYPOCRISY OF THE REPUBLICANS!!!!!!

(Note: When so many of your antics are so easily documented - don't you think it is time to change them?)

Using the editorial style sheet of so many Black Progressive-Fundamentalist opinion writers - it is understood that if you don't want to suffer the attacks that Progressive Professor Cornel West did as he put PROGRESSIVISM over OBAMA - you had better dilute your criticism of "The Commander In Chief" with a well placed opening about the Hypocrisy of the Republicans - despite the fact that there is not one Republican in America who has the POWER to command that a bomb be dropped upon African soil.

I told you before that radio host Bev Smith - reluctant to accept that Obama called the shots in the attacks on Libya - she was "mentally satisfied" with the notion that "The Republicans are trying to kill Gaddahfi".   The other day I heard her say that her main criticism of Obama was that "he allowed so many REPUBLICANS to remain in his cabinet".    With Defense Secretary Gates departing at the end of the month - I seriously doubt that she is going to hold he man who ASKED HIM TO STAY OVER into his administration - accountable for his actions.    If her interview last week with Dick Gregory is any evidence - she said "I don't want to talk about Libya, lets talk about your 'spiritual healing' message".   Knowing that she can no longer cover for Obama on this matter when there is so much television footage of his views that Gaddahfi has got to go - and our bombs will help him make this decision - Bev Smith and others who think like her indeed need some "Spiritual Healing".

As for David Swedlick - he is not willing to fall on his sword in defense of the policies and institutions of America and the sanctity of Africa  to - throw Obama under the bus (with reference to his own ideological convictions) and say that what NATO is doing in Libya under the guise of a "Humanitarian Intervention"  is wrong.

Obama complying with the "War Powers Act" does not change the character of the mission.