Friday, May 20, 2011

Redirection Of The Root.com's Claim About John Lewis: In Lewis' District "Street Pirate Attacks That Are Not Called 'Civil Rights Violations" ARE The "Neo Civil Rights" Battle That Is Not Talked About

Rep. John Lewis: Immigration Is the New Civil Rights Battle

The one think I envy and resent the most about the "Black Racial Market Maker Services Industry" is their ability to define a narrative - even if it has no attachment to the truth that Black people experience in their daily lives".

These operatives believe that they need to "get in front" of the Black masses and our thoughts, their lofty position enabling them a better vantage point than what we see.  They like to believe that we are "transactional" - dealing with the mundane challenges of life while they are VISIONARY.

The truth is that the "Black Racial Market Maker Services Industry" know that Black people are best controlled when we are kept in a racially defensive posture.

Immigration vs Street Piracy

The reason why Rep John Lewis, who presides over one of the most violent districts in the nation - is able to promote the fight on behalf of the "Illegal Immigrant" while no one in his district will make note of the "Civil Rights Violations That Are Not Called 'Civil Rights Violations' For No Other Reason Than The Race Of The Assailant" and call him on it is because this focus allows him to get the Black masses fighting against their favorite enemies - THE REPUBLICANS.

I do not claim that Rep Lewis is to blame directly for the assaults that Black people in his district suffer from disproportionately.   I am only claiming that Lewis is a part of the network of operatives who now have dominate control over the institutions in these places.  In as much as they got into power because of their promises to rescue Black people from:

  • Failed Academic Institutions Due To Racist Mis-allocation of District Funds
  • Unjust Police Who Operate At The Bequest Of A Racist Municipal Government
  • Attacks On Black Economic Interests Due To Capitalistic Raiders
their main fault is that - after obtaining the key seats of power (and getting their names on buildings and street signs) they practice what I call "Establishment Power Repudiation".

We still hear more Blacks today talking about the POWER that Slavery & Jim Crow has us impaired today more than they are willing to make note of their establishment control and how little it has meant in the transformation of our people (particularly our community consciousness).


Even though over the past 2 days I heard 2 different Black talk radio hosts from "Fight The Power Radio" make the case that politics are not going to solve the Black community's problems - both are guilty of constantly planting this seed in the minds of their listeners.


What we have is a group of operatives who know Black people well.
They only need to have a "community organizing" event - which draws a crowd of 1000 Black people in a city and thus proclaim success, patting each other on the back accordingly - while not realizing that when the "Proportionality Filter" is applied - the 40,000,000 Black people in America were not "touched" by their service project.

It is the quest to certify their "favored people" with the lowest most fraudulent appraisal process with the goal of detailing "How Much They FOUGHT For Black People's Interests" that allow the group of them to continue in power, regardless of the molestation of the Black Community's interest that transpired on their watch.

There is no need for me to talk about Illegal Immigration in this particular post.
It is just one more diversion among those who will go to their grave, proud that "They Have Never Discriminated Against Anyone". The truth is that - REGARDLESS of the establishment seats they assume they will NEVER make the case that the aggregation of their THEORIES, applied via POLICY are the reason why the Black Community has remained as too many of us are at present.

I recently republished a reference made by the NAACP in the late 1960's regarding their frustrations with Organized Labor. It appears that the Black worker was the "chosen scab" to break strikes. They noted - that "since IMMIGRATION has leveled off" - the Black worker seeking economic advancement by agreeing to work while the union workers are on strike - they are able to play the margins and play the unions and the employers against each other.

WHY THEN LOGICALLY would John Lewis and others be interested in flooding the American labor force with more souls - marginalizing Black people?

(Clearer explanation: Labor Unions are all about creating a "Labor Monopoly". By forcing the owner to deal with the recognized labor union who represents the workers - the union is able to stand as more equal opposing interests at the negotiating table with this monopoly established. Several federal laws force an employer to deal with the recognized union.

The NAACP letter from the late 1969's notes that Black people were placed in a strategic position. RACISM kept them out of many unions on the one hand. The immigration door to America was relatively closed at the time - leading the Negro in a strategic place where he could gain economic advancement as a "SCAB". If the union doesn't want to hire him before the strike - FINE - he had no loyalty during the strike to those who spat upon him earlier. The letter ultimately challenged the unions to allow Blacks in because when "labor" splinters - they all lose.

My challenge to John Lewis and others who are pushing for quasi-Open Borders - HOW do you consider the legacy of the "Labor Monopoly" as a necessary means of enjoying effective employee representation and negotiating rights but today dismiss this observation as you seek to expand immigration into this nation - with millions of unskilled laborers flowing in from Mexico and Latin America?)

John Lewis is able to claim that he is taking the "compassionate route" - he is focused on "The Least Of These".

In the process he knows that with the masses of the present "Least Of These" in America convinced that their economic problems are due to:

  • Greedy Corporations
  • Taxes That Are Too Low On The Rich
  • Insufficient Government Regulations
  • A Derth Of Redistributive Social Justice Transfer Payments
  • And Most Importantly - A Republican Adversary That Is Blocking PROGRESSIVE PUBLIC POLICY ...............
..........thus they are not going to see him and his theories as an ORGANIC part of the problem.)

No comments:

Post a Comment