If we apply the framework for debate by JingOists in the age of Obama - the words of tacit criticism of how Obama has handled the situation in Libya will stray from the discussion of how the USA has teamed with 3 former African colonizers to bomb an African nation based on a trumped up claim of "Humanitarian Protection" - over to the margins.
- "John McCain's jab at Obama is merely resentment at his loss and second guessing - Ignore the Hater"
- "Commander In Chief Obama, a Black man, is fully aware of the sensitivities that Black people have about US Imperialist Military intervention in Africa. He was wise to use the precision Tomahawk missiles to open up the attack and then back off - leaving Britain, France and Italy to do the main enforcement - the US only supplying drones and logistics. I think that Obama has reached the proper balance, showing his military acumen and his sensitivities as a BLACK MAN"
- "If McCain were president of the USA and did an all out bombing of Libya - his actions would have caused Black people in America to take to the streets in protests of this attack on African soil. OBAMA did his bombing for 'humanitarian reasons'. John McCain would have done expanded bombings in the White Supremacist spirit of blowing all non-White threats to hell. Thank goodness that we have Obama as president to provide this moderation for the interests of the people of Libya who want to be free. Obama will be seen as 'The Liberator of Libya'.
Though these are statements crafted by my own hands - I believe that I am fully versed enough on the key talking points of the base of people that I study that I can produce representative samples of their works.
No comments:
Post a Comment